My understanding of the hermeneutics of philosophy is that a meaning is elicited. Among the perspectives is reading to one meaning. As poet I have a history of cognitive condensation when reading philosophy - an interpretive or hermetic drift. To the point of logocentric epistrophe.
The glimpse of Laruelle's non-standard philosophy in Alexander Galloway's Against the Digital offers on opportunity for such condensation.
On finishing the chapter I ask if the one or the a priori as "prevent" withdraws from the category of Possibility. I also thought that the a priori is a rivenness or decision at standard philosophy? Likely I'm encumbered with Laruelle's non-philosophy from his III or IV period.
The glimpse of Laruelle's non-standard philosophy in Alexander Galloway's Against the Digital offers on opportunity for such condensation.
On finishing the chapter I ask if the one or the a priori as "prevent" withdraws from the category of Possibility. I also thought that the a priori is a rivenness or decision at standard philosophy? Likely I'm encumbered with Laruelle's non-philosophy from his III or IV period.
Entertaining the view that apriorization is riven from at least standard philosophy and its world then we can posit a Non-Laruelle. I think Terence Blake of Agent Swarm blog wrote an article about Non-Laruelle.
Am yet to finish the book. Am yet to read Laruelle's primary texts. I'm familiarising myself some of the terminology like one-in-one, in-one, and still getting my head around vision-in-one and determination in the last instance. I grasp as I read - trust I can commit the terms to memory some time.
Also interested in Laruelle's quantum turn. Floating signification (suspension with a background of apriorization) and the semantic complexity of lived experience. I believe Laruelle is giving a seminar in November this year? A commentator hopes that Laruelle expands on non-Marxism and transit without trauma <--- I don't know what that means. Will posit a likely condensation that transit without trauma relates to amphobology or maybe the great withdrawal of one.
Am yet to finish the book. Am yet to read Laruelle's primary texts. I'm familiarising myself some of the terminology like one-in-one, in-one, and still getting my head around vision-in-one and determination in the last instance. I grasp as I read - trust I can commit the terms to memory some time.
Also interested in Laruelle's quantum turn. Floating signification (suspension with a background of apriorization) and the semantic complexity of lived experience. I believe Laruelle is giving a seminar in November this year? A commentator hopes that Laruelle expands on non-Marxism and transit without trauma <--- I don't know what that means. Will posit a likely condensation that transit without trauma relates to amphobology or maybe the great withdrawal of one.
